![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
sff_corgi_lj.
This is an editorial by Robert Steinback published in the Miami Herald on Tuesday, May 27, 2003 on page 9B. I think it's important; and since I'm reproducing it without permission, I'm reproducing it in full and with full references to avoid misrepresentation.
----------------------------------------------------
It will be a question historians will debate perhaps for centuries to come.
How did a president remain solidly popular with the American people, even though:
There has never been anything like this in American political history. Despite a record of budget irresponsibility, international discord, warmongering and even scandal, the Bush veneer is hardly scuffed.
It isn't anything about Bush; it's about us. We've changed, and not for the better.
It seems only yesterday that the typical American took a delicious pride in holding the feet of political leaders -- even the ones we admired -- to the fire. Whether it was Nixon or Carter or Reagan or Clinton, presidents have had to endure the relentless heat of popular scrutiny. Until now.
Bush exists in a dimension far beyond having to fend off criticism. It's as if critical evaluation itself has gone into hibernation. Virtually nobody questions Bush -- not the opposition Democrats, not the bulk of the media, and by all reckoning, not the public.
There can be only one explanation: Sept. 11. That terrible day in 2001 transformed us in many ways, but the most subtle and insidious change was how it sapped our national confidence.
The terrorist attacks provoked in us not courage, but fear -- fear of being victimized again, as we were that day. We've reacted like the rape victim whose faith in human nature is crushed by anxiety and suspicion, rather than the one who fights back spiritually, refusing to be degraded by a degrading act.
Bush told us that we needed to attack Iraq for our security, and we accepted it. He told us that we needed to compromise certain civil rights to help catch terrorists, and we accepted it. He told us that our security required us to detain suspects without charges or access to lawyers, and we accepted it.
It's as if the American people, shivering with fear, are huddling around Bush as if he were a shepherd. Do whatever you must, dear shepherd; just protect us. Consequently:
When I press Bush supporters on his record, they invariably respond with general references to faith and trust: He has good reasons for what he has done. Time will prove him right. He's a good man.
That's no America I recognize. Some amount of faith is fine and healthy. But aren't we Americans supposed to be feisty, indomitable, demanding, assertive, skeptical?
Sept. 11 rightly made us more cautious and more vigilant. But it also diminished us. We're less tolerand of dissent; less thoughtful about world issues; less concerned with principles of justice, fairness and equity; and -- to the apparent benefit of Bush's poll numbers -- less demanding of our political leaders.
It made us intellectually passive -- which frightens me much more than a hijacked airliner.
rsteinback@herald.com
This is an editorial by Robert Steinback published in the Miami Herald on Tuesday, May 27, 2003 on page 9B. I think it's important; and since I'm reproducing it without permission, I'm reproducing it in full and with full references to avoid misrepresentation.
----------------------------------------------------
It will be a question historians will debate perhaps for centuries to come.
How did a president remain solidly popular with the American people, even though:
- The economy stagnated during his watch;
- He turned a projected federal surplus of $5.7 trillion over the next decade into a projected $2 trillion deficit, fueld by huge tax cuts that enriched the wealthy and failed to stimulate the economy;
- He proposed and won more tax cuts, though most economists warned that they wouldn't likely create more jobs;
- His administration trimmed basic domestic civil rights, including the right to privacy, counsel and habeus corpus;
- He openly scorned relations with traditional allies and potential friends worldwide;
- He launched a war against a sovereign nation without establishing why it was urgent and necessary, and without achieving any of his stated goals for attacking, except regime change;
- The company once headed by his vice president landed a no-bid contract in Iraq far more lucrative than originally revealed?
There has never been anything like this in American political history. Despite a record of budget irresponsibility, international discord, warmongering and even scandal, the Bush veneer is hardly scuffed.
It isn't anything about Bush; it's about us. We've changed, and not for the better.
It seems only yesterday that the typical American took a delicious pride in holding the feet of political leaders -- even the ones we admired -- to the fire. Whether it was Nixon or Carter or Reagan or Clinton, presidents have had to endure the relentless heat of popular scrutiny. Until now.
Bush exists in a dimension far beyond having to fend off criticism. It's as if critical evaluation itself has gone into hibernation. Virtually nobody questions Bush -- not the opposition Democrats, not the bulk of the media, and by all reckoning, not the public.
There can be only one explanation: Sept. 11. That terrible day in 2001 transformed us in many ways, but the most subtle and insidious change was how it sapped our national confidence.
The terrorist attacks provoked in us not courage, but fear -- fear of being victimized again, as we were that day. We've reacted like the rape victim whose faith in human nature is crushed by anxiety and suspicion, rather than the one who fights back spiritually, refusing to be degraded by a degrading act.
Bush told us that we needed to attack Iraq for our security, and we accepted it. He told us that we needed to compromise certain civil rights to help catch terrorists, and we accepted it. He told us that our security required us to detain suspects without charges or access to lawyers, and we accepted it.
It's as if the American people, shivering with fear, are huddling around Bush as if he were a shepherd. Do whatever you must, dear shepherd; just protect us. Consequently:
- We won't even question economic policies that have created a weak dollar, a soft stock market and creeping unemployment.
- We won't explore the logic of disarming the newly freed Iraqi people, while backing a resumption of sales of assault-type weapons at home.
- We won't evaluate the ludicrous notion that Haitian asylum seekers must be imprisoned as a matter of national security, even as migrants from communist Cuba are allowed to swim ashore and go free.
When I press Bush supporters on his record, they invariably respond with general references to faith and trust: He has good reasons for what he has done. Time will prove him right. He's a good man.
That's no America I recognize. Some amount of faith is fine and healthy. But aren't we Americans supposed to be feisty, indomitable, demanding, assertive, skeptical?
Sept. 11 rightly made us more cautious and more vigilant. But it also diminished us. We're less tolerand of dissent; less thoughtful about world issues; less concerned with principles of justice, fairness and equity; and -- to the apparent benefit of Bush's poll numbers -- less demanding of our political leaders.
It made us intellectually passive -- which frightens me much more than a hijacked airliner.
rsteinback@herald.com
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2003-05-29 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-05-29 01:32 pm (UTC)Hey - don't know how long it's good for, but here's the Herald's URL for the piece:
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/columnists/robert_steinback/5949241.htm
no subject
Date: 2003-05-29 01:42 pm (UTC)JB, you and Yin are 2. ;)
no subject
Date: 2003-05-29 05:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-06 06:51 pm (UTC)"'My country, right or wrong' is a thing no patriot would ever think of saying except in a desperate case. It is like saying 'My mother, drunk or sober.'"
I've wanted to get a "Bushwhacked" bumper sticker for my car for a while, but was advised against it by my parents, who worried what might happen to me in the charged post-9/11 atmosphere.
Again, I don't want to start a political argument, but it always seems a wonder to me that conservative politicians still exist. Ideas are always pushing forward, new things are always being discovered and changing our lives--isn't it rather pathetic to be clinging to the ways and thoughts of the past, which are no longer applicable?